Reflective Style and Speech Production During Academic Task Solving In University Students

dc.citation.journalTitleEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics
dc.contributor.affiliationVadym Hetman National Economic University of Kyivuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDonbass State Pedagogical Universityuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
dc.contributor.authorSavchenko, Olena
dc.contributor.authorKalmykov, Heorhii
dc.contributor.authorMalimon, Liudmyla
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-28T09:32:46Z
dc.date.available2021-05-28T09:32:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the article is to examine the relationship between students’ reflective information processing style and speech production during academic tasks solving. The study applies Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (Felder & Solomon, 2001) to examine four pairs of learning styles, notably active –reflective, sensing – intuitive, visual – verbal and sequential - global. The study applies functional analysis suggested by Naydonov (2008). The students were asked to solve the academic tasks aligned with their knowledge of the academic module. The study applies analysis of fourteen categories according to the following two criteria, notably considering the content/meaning of students’ responses and type of solution. The findings indicate that students with a high level of reflective and verbal style less frequently apply category text (34.55±12.39), comparatively with students with a low level of reflective та verbal style (65.94±4.13). Students with a high level of reflective and verbal style more frequently apply category tools (6.61±1.96) and less frequently category intentions (1.69±1.78) comparatively with students with a low level of reflective and verbal style (1.06±.78 and 2.30±.71, respectively). Category models are more frequent in students with a medium level of reflective style (3.61±.99), comparatively with students with a high (2.05±2.76) and a low (2.69±1.01) level. Therefore, speech production in categories of models and tools evaluates the best solutions in the academic setting, providing an efficient academic task solving.
dc.format.extent146-155
dc.identifier.citationSavchenko O., Kalmykov H., Malimon L. Reflective Style and Speech Production During Academic Task Solving In University Students / O. Savchenko, H. Kalmykov, L. Malimon // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics / Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University. – Lutsk, 2020. – Volume 7, Number 1 – P. 146-155.https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.savuk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.sav
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19482
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
dc.subjectreflectionuk_UK
dc.subjectreflectivityuk_UK
dc.subjectreflective styleuk_UK
dc.subjectspeechuk_UK
dc.subjectcontent and meaning-oriented analysisuk_UK
dc.titleReflective Style and Speech Production During Academic Task Solving In University Studentsuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10_EEJPL_7_1_2020_.pdf.pdf
Size:
271.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.73 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: