Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuznetsov, Illia-
dc.contributor.authorKozachuk, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorKachynska, Tetiana-
dc.contributor.authorZhuravlov, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorZhuravlova, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorRakovets, Oksana-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-04T12:20:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-04T12:20:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationKuznetsov, I., Kozachuk, N., Kachynska, T. Inner Speech as a Brain Mechanism for Preconditioning Creativity Process / Illia Kuznetsov, Nataliia Kozachuk, Tetiana Kachynska // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. - № 1(10), 2023. - p. 136-151uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23453-
dc.description.abstractThe current domain of creativity studies is characterized by a high diversity of psychological and neuroscience techniques and methods researchers use. However, the role of verbal processes, especially inner speech, remains underrepresented in this area. Existing studies point to the heterogeneity of inner speech brain mechanisms involved in creative thinking. While consciously controlled verbalized thoughts are associated with the activity of task-dependent brain networks (TPN), especially lateral-frontoparietal network (L-FPN), non-voluntary, mind-wandering thoughts are supposed to correlate with default-mode networks (DMN) activity. While DMN activity leads to an increased number of creative ideas, L-FPN activity results in fewer ideas but increased idea originality. From this point, rest state and state of getting prepared (preconditioning) to task completion, when both mind-wandering and control thoughts occur, are of specific interest. In our study, 49 volunteers completed divergent thinking tasks with rest state and preconditioning state preceded. We later divided all participants into two groups – with low and high creativity levels based on their performance during divergent tasks. EEG was recorded during rest state and preconditioning state and analyzed based on power spectrum and sLORETA data. Our results show an essential role of preconditioning alpha-2 EEG subband in creative thinking performance. The originality of the task solution correlates with the activity of L-FPN structures, while DMN activity does not differ significantly between the two groups.uk_UK
dc.format.extent136–151-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
dc.subjectcreativityuk_UK
dc.subjectdivergent thinkinguk_UK
dc.subjectrest stateuk_UK
dc.subjectpreconditioninguk_UK
dc.subjectEEGuk_UK
dc.subjectdefault-mode networkuk_UK
dc.subjectlatera-frontoparietal networkuk_UK
dc.subjectinner speechuk_UK
dc.titleInner Speech as a Brain Mechanism for Preconditioning Creativity Processuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.rights.holderEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2023uk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.koz-
dc.contributor.affiliationPurdue University, USAuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Ukraineuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLutsk Pedagogical College, Ukraineuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
dc.coverage.placenameLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
Appears in Collections:East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2023, Volume 10, Number 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
136-151.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.