Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/30717
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorSomak, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorDmytrenko, Ihor-
dc.contributor.authorNinyuk, Inna-
dc.contributor.authorSuray,Inna-
dc.contributor.authorNakonechnyi, Oleksandr-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-21T07:11:10Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-21T07:11:10Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-30-
dc.identifier.citationSomak O., Dmytrenko I., Ninyuk I, Suray I., Nakonechnyi O. Innovative practices of public administration: approaches to public sector management in the era of digitalization and open government. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 31st January 2026. Vol. 104. № 2. Pp. 270-285. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454478uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/30717-
dc.description.abstractThe relevance of the study is due to the need for systematic analysis and implementation of the latest public administration practices that ensure the efficiency, transparency and adaptability of public institutions in the context of digitalization, globalization challenges and growing expectations of citizens. The research problem is the insufficient consideration of regional specifics and the effectiveness of renewable energy technologies implementation in the context of energy transformation. The purpose of the study is to systematize the latest public administration practices, identify the factors of their effectiveness, and develop an approach to innovation transfer, taking into account the challenges of digitalization and open government. The research results showed that modern public administration is formed at the intersection of technological innovations and humanistic values, where digitalization is not seen as an end in itself, but as a tool for enhancing transparency, nclusiveness, and trust in the state. A comparative analysis of international and national experience has shown that leading countries focus on creating integrated platform ecosystems and using artificial intelligence, while Ukraine emphasizes mobile services, paperless technologies, and active citizen engagement. Based on the clustering of EGDI dynamics in European countries (2010-2024), the author reveals the uneven development of digital governance and identifies four typical trajectories – from stable leaders to states that are in search of institutional prerequisites for digitalization. It is proved that the universal factors of success are political and institutional leadership, human and financial capacity, regulatory adaptability, cyber resilience, and civic participation. The importance of the humanistic dimension – the ability of innovative practices to reduce digital inequality, ensure social justice and maintain partnership between the state and citizens – is substantiated. Uneven development of digital public administration, limited inclusiveness, and insufficient institutional capacity to implement the latest management practices in the context of sustainable development and public trust have been identified. An effective model of public administration for the future will be based on the synergy of global technological trends and national contexts, combining innovation with a human-centered approach.-
dc.format.extent270–285-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454478uk_UK
dc.subjectDigital Transformationuk_UK
dc.subjectInnovative Practicesuk_UK
dc.subjectAdministrative Managementuk_UK
dc.subjectEGDIuk_UK
dc.subjectCluster Analysisuk_UK
dc.titleInnovative practices of public administration: approaches to public sector management in the era of digitalization and open governmentuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.journalTitleJournal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology-
dc.citation.volume104-
dc.contributor.affiliationZhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Doctoral Student of the Department of Economic Security, Public Administration and Managementuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationZhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Doctoral Student of the Department of Economic Security, Public Administration and Management,uk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of History, Political Science and National Securityuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationVasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administrationuk_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInterregional Academy of Personnel Management, PhD in Public Administration,Kyiv, Ukraineuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSiswadhi F, Widyastuti T, Sawitri NN, Hadita H, Yuliviona R. Transformational leadership in e-government: Fostering innovation and efficiency in public administration. International Journal of Social and Human. 2025;2(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.59613/5ebaf708uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesTejedo-Romero F, Araujo JFFE, Tejada Á, Ramírez Y. E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society. 2022;70:101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesRizk A, Lindgren I. Automated decisionmaking in public administration: Changing the decision space between public officials and citizens. Government Information Quarterly. 2025;42(3):102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102061uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesPopa I, Ștefan SC, Olariu AA, Popa ȘC. Integrating digitalization opportunities into innovative public organizations’ management process. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024;9(4):100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100564uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesYang C, Gu M, Albitar K. Government in the digital age: Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024;208:123722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAryatama S, Miswan M, Fahriyah F, Pribadi T, Suacana IWG. Enhancing governance efficiency through digital transformation in public services: Lessons from global practices. Global International Journal of Innovative Research. 2024;2(5):1019–27. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i5.171uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSavitska V. Digitalisation of the public administration system in the context of economic and legal areas of European integration. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2025;11(1):270–80. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1- 270-280uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOECD. The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-enuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesMettler T, Miscione G, Jacobs CD, Guenduez AA. Same same but different: How policies frame societal-level digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly. 2024;41(2):101932.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKitsios F, Kamariotou M, Mavromatis A. Drivers and outcomes of digital transformation: The case of public sector services. Information. 2023;14(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010043uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesWijaya S, Alfitri, Thamrin MH, Salya DH. The impact of electronic government policy on transparency and accountability in public services. International Journal of Science and Society. 2024;6(2):411–21. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1157uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesZiyadin S, Malayev K, Fernández-Plazaola I, Ismail G, Beyzhanova A. Digital modernization of the system of public administration: Prerogatives and barriers. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020;159:05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015905003uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesPasenko N. Current trends in digital transformation of public administration. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics. 2022;9(2):46– 51. https://doi.org/10.52566/msuecon.9(2).2022.46-51uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOECD. The digital transformation of Norway's public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/1620e542-enuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesGuenduez AA, Demircioglu MA, Mueller EM, Cinar E. Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy. 2025;54(8):105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAndroniceanu A, Georgescu I. Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review. 2023;21(1):7–30.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesZuiderwijk A, Chen Y-C, Salem F. Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(3):101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesShin B, Floch J, Rask M, Bæck P, Edgar C, Berditchevskaia A, et al. A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly. 2024;41(3):101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBi R. Digital democracy: Enhancing democratic participation and political transparency through digital technologies. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 2024;58(1):285–91. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753- 7048/58/20241718uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAmankwah-Amoah J, Khan Z, Wood G, Knight G. COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research. 2021;136:602–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesThomas J. Digital transformation in public administration: Embracing the future. Journal of Research in International Business and Management. 2024;11(1). https://doi.org/10.14303/jribm.2024.002uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesQaedi A, Nugroho BY. A literature review: Cross-sector collaboration arrangements to deliver public services and goods. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 2023;40:1–10. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8342uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAlmazrouei F, Elias Sarker A, Zervopoulos P, Yousaf S. Organizational structure, agility, and public value-driven innovation performance in the UAE public services. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):e33261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33261uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKrogh AH, Triantafillou P. Developing new public governance as a public management reform model. Public Management Review. 2024;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.231353 9uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesŻuchowski I, Sharlovych Z, Mandych O. Digital transformation and technologies for sustainable development all branches of modern education, science and practice [conference proceedings]. International Scientific and Practical Conference, January 26, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.58246/JVXL4879uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOsemeike GE, Courage I, Patience OP, Tochukwu II. Strategic approaches for successful digital transformation in project management across industries. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering and Technology Research. 2024;7(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfetr.2024.7.1.0037uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBuonocore F, Annosi MC, de Gennaro D, Riemma F. Digital transformation and social change: Leadership strategies for responsible innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2024;74:101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.1018 43uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesGębczyńska A, Brajer-Marczak R. Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences. 2020;10(4):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040099uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOECD. Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021a. https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-enuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesMamyrbaeva Z, Ketners K, Zheenalieva A, Sheripov N, Hudyma O. Public administration effectiveness in crises and emergencies: Experiences and lessons from different countries. CERIDAP. 2025 Apr 7. https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2025-2-5uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesPetrukha N, Petrukha S, Alekseienko N, Kushneruk O, Mazur A. Social imperatives of public finance: War adaptation and principles of post-war recovery. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023;3(50):358–71. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4031uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesIlychok B, Karkovska V, Dziurakh Y, Маrмulyak A. Changing trends in Ukraine's demographic security as a key indicator of socioeconomic stability. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023;2(49):350–60. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.49.2023.4020uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesLoukis EN. Social science computer review. In: Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J, editors. Digital era governance – IT corporations, the state and e-government. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. 26(2):254–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307304515uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesE-Government benchmark 2022: Synchronising digital governments. Background report. Publications Office of the European Union; 2022. https://doi.org/10.2759/488218uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesDigital Decade 2024: eGovernment benchmark. Shaping Europe’s digital future. EC; 2024. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade2024-egovernment-benchmarkuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBobrovska O, Drobot I, Nadyuk Z, Hrytsko R, Pokataev P. Modern theories of public administration: Experience for Ukraine. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. 2020;27(4):107–20. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.27(4).2020.107- 120uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOmelyanenko VA, Fantaiev VE. Methodical aspects of assessing the impact of implementation stages of smart city projects on the social and economic impacts. Zenodo. 2024 Aug 20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13326540uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesIlliashenko NS, Myronenko AІ. Analysis of innovative approaches to public administration. State and Regions. Series: Public Management and Administration. 2025;1:94–100. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2025.1.15uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesE-Government Development Index. Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations; 2025. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/enus/data-centeruk_UK
dc.relation.referencesE-Gov Development Index (UN EGDI) – Overall score. World Bank Data; 2024. https://data360.worldbank.org/en/indicator/UN _EGDI_EGDIuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesHandoyo S. Public governance and national environmental performance nexus: Evidence from cross-country studies. Heliyon. 2024;10(23):e40637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40637uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesFar SB, Imani Rad A, Rajabzadeh Assar M. Blockchain and its derived technologies shape the future generation of digital businesses: A focus on decentralized finance and the Metaverse. Data Science and Management. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2023.06.002uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesYurchyshyn OYa, Stepanets OV, Skorobogatova NYe. Analysis of digital technologies in Ukraine: Problems and prospects. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2024. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol3781/paper15.pdfuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAlaassar A, Mention A-L, Aas TH. Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators: The case of regulatory sandboxes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;160:120257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120257uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesDel-Real C, De Busser E, van den Berg B. Shielding software systems: A comparison of security by design and privacy by design based on a systematic literature review. Computer Law & Security Review. 2024;52:105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105933uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOkon SU, Olateju OO, Ogungbemi OS, Joseph SA, Olisa AO, Olaniyi OO. Incorporating privacy by design principles in the modification of AI systems in preventing breaches across multiple environments, including public cloud, private cloud, and onprem. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 2024;26(9):136–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i91269uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesEurope’s digital decade strategic roadmap: Estonia. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of Estonia; 2025.https://www.justdigi.ee/sites/default/files/docu ments/2025- 03/Estonian%20National%20Digital%20Decad e%20Strategic%20Roadmap%202025.pdfuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesUkraine digital development country profile. International Telecommunication Union; 2025. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/RegionalPresence/Europe/Documents/Publications/2025 /Final_Ukraine%20Digital%20Development% 20Country%20Profile%20version%203.0.pdfuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesLaw of Ukraine on electronic trust services. Law of Ukraine No. 2155-VIII; 2024. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155- 19#Textuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesLaw of Ukraine on public electronic registers. Law of Ukraine No. 1907-IX; 2022. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1907- 20#Textuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesOECD. Korean focus areas: A global powerhouse in science and technology. 2021b. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/koreanfocus-areas_f91f3b75-en/a-global-powerhousein-science-and-technology_61cbd1ad-en.htmluk_UK
dc.relation.referencesCheong I, Cho J. Digital government in the Republic of Korea: Evaluation and challenges. In: Chen L, Kimura F, editors. Empowering Online Public Service in Asia: The Digital Frontier. Jakarta: ERIA; 2024. https://www.eria.org/uploads/07-Chapter-6- Digital-Government-in-the-Republic-ofKorea.pdfuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBojarski Ł, Wiaderek G. Legal think tanks and government – Capacity building country report: Poland. 2017. https://www.inpris.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/do cuments/TT_GOV/LTTs-and_Gover-2017- country-report-Poland.pdfuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Union supports Ukraine’s digital path to the EU: DT4UA project results. EEAS; 2025. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukrain e/european-union-supportsukraine%E2%80%99s-digital-path-eu-dt4uaproject-results_enuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesYermachenko V, Bondarenko D, Akimova L, Karpa M, Akimov O, Kalashnyk N. Theory and practice of public management of smart infrastructure in the conditions of the digital society development: Socio-economic aspects. Economic Affairs (New Delhi). 2023;68(1):617–33. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKattel R, Mergel I. Estonia's digital transformation: Mission mystique and the hiding hand. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. https://surl.li/rdpuhzuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesVyhovska V, Sholudko V, Balytska M. State digital transformation in Ukraine: 2019–2024 review. VoxUkraine. 2025. https://voxukraine.org/en/state-digitaltransformation-in-ukraine-2019-2024-reviewuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesCzerniak A, Płóciennik S. Public investment in Poland. In: The Great Reset. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers; 2021. p. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0280.05uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesMillard J. Impact of digital transformation on public governance – New forms of policymaking and the provision of innovative, people-centric and inclusive public services. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2023. https://doi.org/10.2760/204686uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesAzmat F, Lim WM, Moyeen A, Voola R, Gupta G. Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research. 2023;167:114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114170uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesCholyshkina O, Karnaukh A, Volianiuk O, Ostapenko M, Holishevska A. Public participation and innovative technologies: The role of artificial intelligence in public administration and sustainable development. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2024;3:974. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024974uk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові роботи (FH)

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
zenodo.18454478.pdf870,52 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.