Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/30717Повний запис метаданих
| Поле DC | Значення | Мова |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Somak, Oleksandr | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dmytrenko, Ihor | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ninyuk, Inna | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Suray,Inna | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Nakonechnyi, Oleksandr | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-21T07:11:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-21T07:11:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-01-30 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Somak O., Dmytrenko I., Ninyuk I, Suray I., Nakonechnyi O. Innovative practices of public administration: approaches to public sector management in the era of digitalization and open government. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 31st January 2026. Vol. 104. № 2. Pp. 270-285. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454478 | uk_UK |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/30717 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The relevance of the study is due to the need for systematic analysis and implementation of the latest public administration practices that ensure the efficiency, transparency and adaptability of public institutions in the context of digitalization, globalization challenges and growing expectations of citizens. The research problem is the insufficient consideration of regional specifics and the effectiveness of renewable energy technologies implementation in the context of energy transformation. The purpose of the study is to systematize the latest public administration practices, identify the factors of their effectiveness, and develop an approach to innovation transfer, taking into account the challenges of digitalization and open government. The research results showed that modern public administration is formed at the intersection of technological innovations and humanistic values, where digitalization is not seen as an end in itself, but as a tool for enhancing transparency, nclusiveness, and trust in the state. A comparative analysis of international and national experience has shown that leading countries focus on creating integrated platform ecosystems and using artificial intelligence, while Ukraine emphasizes mobile services, paperless technologies, and active citizen engagement. Based on the clustering of EGDI dynamics in European countries (2010-2024), the author reveals the uneven development of digital governance and identifies four typical trajectories – from stable leaders to states that are in search of institutional prerequisites for digitalization. It is proved that the universal factors of success are political and institutional leadership, human and financial capacity, regulatory adaptability, cyber resilience, and civic participation. The importance of the humanistic dimension – the ability of innovative practices to reduce digital inequality, ensure social justice and maintain partnership between the state and citizens – is substantiated. Uneven development of digital public administration, limited inclusiveness, and insufficient institutional capacity to implement the latest management practices in the context of sustainable development and public trust have been identified. An effective model of public administration for the future will be based on the synergy of global technological trends and national contexts, combining innovation with a human-centered approach. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 270–285 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454478 | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | Digital Transformation | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | Innovative Practices | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | Administrative Management | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | EGDI | uk_UK |
| dc.subject | Cluster Analysis | uk_UK |
| dc.title | Innovative practices of public administration: approaches to public sector management in the era of digitalization and open government | uk_UK |
| dc.type | Article | uk_UK |
| dc.citation.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.journalTitle | Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 104 | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Doctoral Student of the Department of Economic Security, Public Administration and Management | uk_UK |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Doctoral Student of the Department of Economic Security, Public Administration and Management, | uk_UK |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, PhD in Public Administration, Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of History, Political Science and National Security | uk_UK |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University, Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Professor of the Department of Public Management and Administration | uk_UK |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, PhD in Public Administration,Kyiv, Ukraine | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Siswadhi F, Widyastuti T, Sawitri NN, Hadita H, Yuliviona R. Transformational leadership in e-government: Fostering innovation and efficiency in public administration. International Journal of Social and Human. 2025;2(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.59613/5ebaf708 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Tejedo-Romero F, Araujo JFFE, Tejada Á, Ramírez Y. E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society. 2022;70:101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Rizk A, Lindgren I. Automated decisionmaking in public administration: Changing the decision space between public officials and citizens. Government Information Quarterly. 2025;42(3):102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102061 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Popa I, Ștefan SC, Olariu AA, Popa ȘC. Integrating digitalization opportunities into innovative public organizations’ management process. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024;9(4):100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100564 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Yang C, Gu M, Albitar K. Government in the digital age: Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024;208:123722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Aryatama S, Miswan M, Fahriyah F, Pribadi T, Suacana IWG. Enhancing governance efficiency through digital transformation in public services: Lessons from global practices. Global International Journal of Innovative Research. 2024;2(5):1019–27. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i5.171 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Savitska V. Digitalisation of the public administration system in the context of economic and legal areas of European integration. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2025;11(1):270–80. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1- 270-280 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Mettler T, Miscione G, Jacobs CD, Guenduez AA. Same same but different: How policies frame societal-level digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly. 2024;41(2):101932. | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Kitsios F, Kamariotou M, Mavromatis A. Drivers and outcomes of digital transformation: The case of public sector services. Information. 2023;14(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010043 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Wijaya S, Alfitri, Thamrin MH, Salya DH. The impact of electronic government policy on transparency and accountability in public services. International Journal of Science and Society. 2024;6(2):411–21. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1157 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Ziyadin S, Malayev K, Fernández-Plazaola I, Ismail G, Beyzhanova A. Digital modernization of the system of public administration: Prerogatives and barriers. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020;159:05003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015905003 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Pasenko N. Current trends in digital transformation of public administration. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics. 2022;9(2):46– 51. https://doi.org/10.52566/msuecon.9(2).2022.46-51 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. The digital transformation of Norway's public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/1620e542-en | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Guenduez AA, Demircioglu MA, Mueller EM, Cinar E. Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy. 2025;54(8):105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Androniceanu A, Georgescu I. Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review. 2023;21(1):7–30. | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Zuiderwijk A, Chen Y-C, Salem F. Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(3):101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Shin B, Floch J, Rask M, Bæck P, Edgar C, Berditchevskaia A, et al. A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly. 2024;41(3):101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Bi R. Digital democracy: Enhancing democratic participation and political transparency through digital technologies. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 2024;58(1):285–91. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753- 7048/58/20241718 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Amankwah-Amoah J, Khan Z, Wood G, Knight G. COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research. 2021;136:602–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Thomas J. Digital transformation in public administration: Embracing the future. Journal of Research in International Business and Management. 2024;11(1). https://doi.org/10.14303/jribm.2024.002 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Qaedi A, Nugroho BY. A literature review: Cross-sector collaboration arrangements to deliver public services and goods. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 2023;40:1–10. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8342 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Almazrouei F, Elias Sarker A, Zervopoulos P, Yousaf S. Organizational structure, agility, and public value-driven innovation performance in the UAE public services. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):e33261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33261 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Krogh AH, Triantafillou P. Developing new public governance as a public management reform model. Public Management Review. 2024;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.231353 9 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Żuchowski I, Sharlovych Z, Mandych O. Digital transformation and technologies for sustainable development all branches of modern education, science and practice [conference proceedings]. International Scientific and Practical Conference, January 26, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.58246/JVXL4879 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Osemeike GE, Courage I, Patience OP, Tochukwu II. Strategic approaches for successful digital transformation in project management across industries. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering and Technology Research. 2024;7(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfetr.2024.7.1.0037 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Buonocore F, Annosi MC, de Gennaro D, Riemma F. Digital transformation and social change: Leadership strategies for responsible innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2024;74:101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.1018 43 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Gębczyńska A, Brajer-Marczak R. Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences. 2020;10(4):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040099 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021a. https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Mamyrbaeva Z, Ketners K, Zheenalieva A, Sheripov N, Hudyma O. Public administration effectiveness in crises and emergencies: Experiences and lessons from different countries. CERIDAP. 2025 Apr 7. https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2025-2-5 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Petrukha N, Petrukha S, Alekseienko N, Kushneruk O, Mazur A. Social imperatives of public finance: War adaptation and principles of post-war recovery. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023;3(50):358–71. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4031 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Ilychok B, Karkovska V, Dziurakh Y, Маrмulyak A. Changing trends in Ukraine's demographic security as a key indicator of socioeconomic stability. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023;2(49):350–60. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.49.2023.4020 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Loukis EN. Social science computer review. In: Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J, editors. Digital era governance – IT corporations, the state and e-government. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. 26(2):254–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307304515 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | E-Government benchmark 2022: Synchronising digital governments. Background report. Publications Office of the European Union; 2022. https://doi.org/10.2759/488218 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Digital Decade 2024: eGovernment benchmark. Shaping Europe’s digital future. EC; 2024. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade2024-egovernment-benchmark | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Bobrovska O, Drobot I, Nadyuk Z, Hrytsko R, Pokataev P. Modern theories of public administration: Experience for Ukraine. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. 2020;27(4):107–20. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.27(4).2020.107- 120 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Omelyanenko VA, Fantaiev VE. Methodical aspects of assessing the impact of implementation stages of smart city projects on the social and economic impacts. Zenodo. 2024 Aug 20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13326540 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Illiashenko NS, Myronenko AІ. Analysis of innovative approaches to public administration. State and Regions. Series: Public Management and Administration. 2025;1:94–100. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2025.1.15 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | E-Government Development Index. Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations; 2025. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/enus/data-center | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | E-Gov Development Index (UN EGDI) – Overall score. World Bank Data; 2024. https://data360.worldbank.org/en/indicator/UN _EGDI_EGDI | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Handoyo S. Public governance and national environmental performance nexus: Evidence from cross-country studies. Heliyon. 2024;10(23):e40637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40637 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Far SB, Imani Rad A, Rajabzadeh Assar M. Blockchain and its derived technologies shape the future generation of digital businesses: A focus on decentralized finance and the Metaverse. Data Science and Management. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2023.06.002 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Yurchyshyn OYa, Stepanets OV, Skorobogatova NYe. Analysis of digital technologies in Ukraine: Problems and prospects. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2024. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol3781/paper15.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Alaassar A, Mention A-L, Aas TH. Exploring how social interactions influence regulators and innovators: The case of regulatory sandboxes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;160:120257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120257 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Del-Real C, De Busser E, van den Berg B. Shielding software systems: A comparison of security by design and privacy by design based on a systematic literature review. Computer Law & Security Review. 2024;52:105933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105933 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Okon SU, Olateju OO, Ogungbemi OS, Joseph SA, Olisa AO, Olaniyi OO. Incorporating privacy by design principles in the modification of AI systems in preventing breaches across multiple environments, including public cloud, private cloud, and onprem. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 2024;26(9):136–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i91269 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Europe’s digital decade strategic roadmap: Estonia. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of Estonia; 2025.https://www.justdigi.ee/sites/default/files/docu ments/2025- 03/Estonian%20National%20Digital%20Decad e%20Strategic%20Roadmap%202025.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Ukraine digital development country profile. International Telecommunication Union; 2025. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/RegionalPresence/Europe/Documents/Publications/2025 /Final_Ukraine%20Digital%20Development% 20Country%20Profile%20version%203.0.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Law of Ukraine on electronic trust services. Law of Ukraine No. 2155-VIII; 2024. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155- 19#Text | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Law of Ukraine on public electronic registers. Law of Ukraine No. 1907-IX; 2022. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1907- 20#Text | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | OECD. Korean focus areas: A global powerhouse in science and technology. 2021b. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/koreanfocus-areas_f91f3b75-en/a-global-powerhousein-science-and-technology_61cbd1ad-en.html | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Cheong I, Cho J. Digital government in the Republic of Korea: Evaluation and challenges. In: Chen L, Kimura F, editors. Empowering Online Public Service in Asia: The Digital Frontier. Jakarta: ERIA; 2024. https://www.eria.org/uploads/07-Chapter-6- Digital-Government-in-the-Republic-ofKorea.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Bojarski Ł, Wiaderek G. Legal think tanks and government – Capacity building country report: Poland. 2017. https://www.inpris.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/do cuments/TT_GOV/LTTs-and_Gover-2017- country-report-Poland.pdf | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | European Union supports Ukraine’s digital path to the EU: DT4UA project results. EEAS; 2025. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukrain e/european-union-supportsukraine%E2%80%99s-digital-path-eu-dt4uaproject-results_en | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Yermachenko V, Bondarenko D, Akimova L, Karpa M, Akimov O, Kalashnyk N. Theory and practice of public management of smart infrastructure in the conditions of the digital society development: Socio-economic aspects. Economic Affairs (New Delhi). 2023;68(1):617–33. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.29 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Kattel R, Mergel I. Estonia's digital transformation: Mission mystique and the hiding hand. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. https://surl.li/rdpuhz | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Vyhovska V, Sholudko V, Balytska M. State digital transformation in Ukraine: 2019–2024 review. VoxUkraine. 2025. https://voxukraine.org/en/state-digitaltransformation-in-ukraine-2019-2024-review | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Czerniak A, Płóciennik S. Public investment in Poland. In: The Great Reset. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers; 2021. p. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0280.05 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Millard J. Impact of digital transformation on public governance – New forms of policymaking and the provision of innovative, people-centric and inclusive public services. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2023. https://doi.org/10.2760/204686 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Azmat F, Lim WM, Moyeen A, Voola R, Gupta G. Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research. 2023;167:114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114170 | uk_UK |
| dc.relation.references | Cholyshkina O, Karnaukh A, Volianiuk O, Ostapenko M, Holishevska A. Public participation and innovative technologies: The role of artificial intelligence in public administration and sustainable development. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2024;3:974. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024974 | uk_UK |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: | Наукові роботи (FH) | |
Файли цього матеріалу:
| Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zenodo.18454478.pdf | 870,52 kB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/відкрити |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.